College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Veggie variety

Vegan students find fitting culinary options on, off campus

Staff Writer

Published: Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, November 4, 2009 23:11

Presley Nash

Tim Welch (left) and Annie Stump (right) eat at Nagoya, 2260 N. Perkins Road, because it offers vegan food choices. Stump became a vegan a year ago because she is against the commercialized processes the food industry uses on animals.

When Annie Stump goes out to eat, choosing an entrée is more difficult than simply skimming a menu for the most appetizing choice.

Stump, a hotel and restaurant administration senior and a vegetarian for four years, became a vegan a year ago. Checking for animal byproducts in every item before she orders is a habit.

“It is hard to defend the way I eat when no one else has to,” Stump said. “I don’t ever really get frustrated because I always know why I do it.”

Stump said one of the reasons she has maintained her vegan lifestyle is because of her strong support system. One of Stump’s greatest supports has been her boyfriend, Tim Welch, also a vegan. They met during an ECO-OSU meeting about a month after she decided to become a vegan.

“We basically did it together,” Stump said. “Just having someone to lean on when you want a Cheez-It is important.”

She said the easiest choice while living in Stillwater is to cook their own meals together in large batches for the entire week. They also eat at restaurants like Shalimar, 2617 W. Sixth Ave., and Nagoya, 2260 N. Perkins Road.

Laney Brassield, Nagoya employee, said offering vegan and vegetarian options is important for the restaurant.

“My bosses came from New York City and they worked with a variety of food,” Brassield said. “They wanted to bring that to Stillwater.”

Nagoya offers vegetable rolls in place of sushi rolls. Cucumber, avocado, sweet potato and even a pickle roll are vegan choices at Nagoya, she said.

“We also have vegetables and fried rice,” Brassield said. “The rice has egg in it, but you can get it without and that is vegan.” 

For fast food, she eats at chalupas at Taco Bell.

One of the biggest misconceptions about veganism is that it is expensive, Stump said.

“I am one of the poorest college students and being a vegan is helpful,” Stump said. “As long as you go to the grocery, it saves money.”

Stump became a vegan because she is against the processes the animals go through and did not want it on her conscience. She said she avoids the egg industry for its treatment of chickens as well as the milk industry because of its indirect support of the veal industry.  

“If it were 12 chickens on a farm laying eggs like the way it used to be done, then I would be fine,” she said. “But food products are so commercialized anymore it is basically torture.” 

The OSU University Dining Services has started programs to better accommodate vegetarian and vegan diets with programs, such as last year’s push for more organic products. 

Terry Baker, director of University Dining Services, said it began “Farm to University” this year, which is a program that brings in fresher farm products. 

“We work with local farms to bring feature local produce for a more fresh and healthy menu,” Baker said.

University Dining Services offers vegan options at almost every location, particularly the two stir fry stations and four salad bars. Baker recommends sending comments to the

University Dining Services Web site if more options are needed to accommodate a vegan diet.

“We try to focus on organic and healthy choices,” Baker said. “As we branch out, there will be even more options.”

* * *

There’s a difference:

Vegetarian — a person who does not eat or does not believe in eating meat, fish, fowl and sometimes food derived from animals, such as eggs or cheese, but subsists on vegetables, fruits, nuts, grain, etc.

Vegan — a vegetarian who omits all animal products from the diet.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

13 comments

meat.
Wed Dec 16 2009 11:42
i love the first comment on here.
Tsk tsk
Fri Nov 6 2009 18:44
I care what's in a chalupa, particularly the yummy meat and sour cream!!! Decadent strands of delicious cheese melting over it in a gooey swirl of deliciousness. That crispy shell, oh so good!!!! This is making me thirsty for a glass of milk, cold and frothy, just like I like it. The only thing better is a nice bag of Cheetos and a Slim Jim. Meat..... it's what for dinner. Milk, it does a body good.
veg
Fri Nov 6 2009 16:52
I know of no person who thinks they are overly important because they chose not to eat meat. In fact, as is evident by the negativity of this article, most vegetarians are met with outright hostitlity about their choice not to eat meat. it's rather ridiculous.

If you don't care about someone's choice not to eat meat, why did you read the article and why are you commenting on it? There are many things I don't really care about, and when I don't care about something I don't read it, or post comments about it - I ignore it.

meat
Fri Nov 6 2009 16:44
I think the negitivity about this article is so strong because the focus ON meat is a large part of our college. To date I do not know of ANY articles that depict the work the professors and students within the animal science department.
This is the second article that I have seen over an individual being Vegan, the last one is pretty fresh in my mind.

And honestly, with more people eating meat then not, I really dont care to learn how some one thinks they are overly important because they chose not to do so.

Meg
Fri Nov 6 2009 15:09
You know, I've beem thinking about this obligation to show both sides of the story, and maybe people are right. Maybe both sides should always be presented. So how about this; whenever the O'Colly does a story somehow involving vegetarians or vegans, the pro-meat side should be interviewed for comment. And whenever it does a story somehow involving meat or meat-eating or meat -producing, the veggie side should be interviewed for comment. Sound fair?
Meg
Fri Nov 6 2009 14:53
Why do you care about what's in a chalupa? No one's forcing you to eat one.

Surely the other side of the story is represented every time there is a story that involves agriculture that does not question meat producing practices. We live in OK--is anyone really trying to argue that veggies and vegans get too much media coverage?

Tsk tsk
Fri Nov 6 2009 12:45
Tim, Taco Bell's website clearly says the chalupa shell contains dried milk powder. Right underneath that, in capital letter, it says it contains milk. It's not *if* when it's clearly listed. It would be just the same as if I passed myself off as a vegan, and I ate a nice, juicy Big Mac every day for lunch, because I didn't know it had meat in it. I really didn't know it was meat. It doesn't say meat anywhere in the name. Whatever shall I do? Hmmm. Maybe I could spend 5 minutes looking on the ingredient list, and yep, sure enough it's listed. I wouldn't be a vegan, now would I? I think I would just be ignorant. Now, if the O'Colly ran a story about me, and I said I was a vegan, and they had the golden arches behind me, and the Big Mac in my hand, and I went into detail about how I made certain there was absolutely no cheese on my Big Mac, no special sauce, just those two delicous patties, don't you think I would deserve to have someone mention that there's meat on the sandwich? Do you think I could still pass myself off as being a vegan for the past few years? Your rebuttal about the nut allergy doesn't follow. You can say they have a nut allergy, but they eat nuts. You can't say someone is a vegan that eats milk. Because, then I'm a vegan that eats meat. Or, would I simply be ignorant?
Tim
Fri Nov 6 2009 11:56
Actually she is a vegan the Chulas she eats don't *have* milk products in them. She removes the meat, cheese, and sour-cream. Even *if* the bread in the food she eat contained milk products, it still wouldn't follow she isn't a vegan, but rather she was uninformed about all of the ingredients in the food. Just as someone with an allergy to nuts, would still be allergic to nuts even if they accidently consumed something with nuts in it.

It is very ironic the meat industry gets very defensive and upset even if someone mentions they don't eat meat, or might cut it down. It's kind of amusing actually.

Tim Welch
Fri Nov 6 2009 11:52
I would like to make a few remarks pertaining to the comments and accusations made against Stump, and vegans in general. Firstly, the person who claimed vegans derive their knowledge predominantly from the "media” is making an unfounded accusation, and basing it upon inadequate knowledge. Never in the article did she mention from where or how she arrived at her opinions nor the sources for her views. Secondarily, jumping to the conclusion that she supports PETA, is a part of PETA, or even generating opinions based upon information from PETA is a complete fabrication on the part of the author of the never did she mention the word "PETA" in the article. The fact the author brought in PETA only demonstrates their biases and prejudices. The accusations Stump made against the agricultural industry were claims about large factory farms, such as the ones run by Tyson. The very ones which polluted to Illinois river in Oklahoma. Even if large factory farms treated their animals, nonetheless there are plenty of sound reasons to still go vegetarian/vegan – whether it is for the inherent health benefits of reducing/eliminating meat from ones diet, or due to the environmental ramifications associated with mass producing meat.
To the second comment: "Why do Vegans keep getting featured on the front page?" I was completely unware there was a plethora of articles pertaining to vegans in the paper. In fact, considering vegetarians and vegans only comprise approximately 2% of the population, it’s astounding there are any articles at all, and to my knowledge there are very few articles. Also, in order to determine whether or not the meat industry tortures animals one would have to define “torture” and considering there are very few laws relating to animal welfare, the meat industry still could be in business. Most Americans don’t care where their food comes from, and know very little about the processes used to slaughter the animals.
Claiming meat is “humane” for the body is a completely incoherent statement. Regardless of whether or not the meat industry treats animals in an inhumane way, claiming meat is “humane” is simply a statement which lacks any meaning. As for the alleged benefits of consuming meat, the problems associated with the enormous amounts of animal protein (esp. in the form of red meat) humans eat completely outweigh any possible benefits of consuming meat. In fact, if this weren’t the case the Johns Hopkins school of public health wouldn’t work to reduce American consumption of meat by 15%. Many doctors advise cutting down red meat, or all meat, as a part of a healthy diet. Meat may have some benefits, but a well balanced vegetarian diet can provide sufficient amounts of protein, iron, fiber, calcium, folic acid, etc.

The accusations against Stump are unfounded, often predicated upon misconceptions and assumptions the authors themselves put into the article, probably as a result of insufficient knowledge of vegetarian and vegan lifestyles, which is why it is am imperative for the Ocolly to run stories about vegetarians – to clear up misconceptions about being vegetarian/vegan.

As a last note, why are the authors afraid to reveal who they are? I'm perfectly hapy to show who I am and engage the authors in a friendly discussion over the reasons for going vegetarian, and the lifestyle of a vegetarian.

Tsk tsk
Fri Nov 6 2009 09:10
But, Meg, she's not a vegan. The food she eats (chalupas) has milk products in it.

Also, I think the others are showing more of a response to inaccurate reporting and skewed information concerning animals. I would suggest the writer and the subject go out to a farm and see what life is actually like. Would be interesting to read the follow-up story on that one. Did the writer even try to interview someone in our AnSci department? No, it's easier to just report on one side of the story.

Meg
Thu Nov 5 2009 23:31
Interesting how a simple interview with a vegan leads to defensive responses by meat eaters. She is not forcing anyone else to make the same lifestyle choice, so why not let her get on with it?
Ansi_undergrad
Thu Nov 5 2009 18:26
I find it interesting that this article printed on the front page of the O’colly includes accusations against the livestock industries of being cruel to and “torturing” livestock used for food production. It is interesting that there are vegetarians and vegans out there that make claims against the livestock industries for mistreatment of animals based upon reports seen in the news and media from animal rights extremist groups such as PETA and HSUS. The truth is livestock producers take great interest in the care of their livestock because these animals are their livelihood. Multi-generational agriculture families like my own, make caring for and raising livestock their way of life and take great pride in their work. If this student-funded paper wants to print stories with comments from interviews, they might want to check with the university’s own academia community for validation of statements like “But food products are so commercialized anymore it is basically torture.” If you really want to find out where your food comes from ask someone in agriculture. There are plenty of resources at hand. A great example of how beef gets to your table is beeffrompasturetoplate.com and information on the nutritional values of beef and other consumer information is mybeefcheckoff.com on the ‘Consumer Information’ page. In addition, if food production were to revert to “12 chickens on a farm laying eggs like the way it used to be done” there would be no way the agriculture community could provide enough food to feed the growing populations not only in this country, but also in the world as a whole. It is interesting that student fees fund this paper and the largest department on campus happens to be the Animal Science department, a nationally recognized program for their research in animal production, and stories like this still end up being printed. Just goes to show how much credibility, or lack thereof, the university paper here at OSU has.
--Animal Science Undergrad and Cattle Producer
meat
Thu Nov 5 2009 14:06
Why do vegans keep getting featured on the front page of the paper??

Stumps comment about the processing of meat is also inaccurate. I realize it is her opinion but if the meat industry was "torturing" animals or even "basiciall torturing" animals for consumption they would be out of business. There are rules and regulations for everything including the transportation of the animal. Her comment would suggest, to people that are unaware of how meat is processed that the meat industry is cruel.
Seeing as the Oklahoma State College has a meat sceince program and lab on campus, why not run a story on their research and how humane and benifitial meat can be to the human body.
Oh, but thats right, the O'colly is libral so nevermind







log out