Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

The feminist mystake

Forum Columnist

Published: Thursday, March 4, 2010

Updated: Thursday, March 4, 2010 22:03

Foreword: I know after seeing the word "feminism," you'll be tempted to stop reading, but please don't. It won't be what you're thinking.

American feminism has achieved a lot of wonderful things — suffrage, equal opportunities in employment and education, and countless other liberties generations of women before us weren't privy to.

Unfortunately, the word "feminism" no longer refers to true equity feminism, but conjures up images of bra-burning, pro-choice rallies and The Vagina Monologues.

Modern feminists like to divide the movement into three waves. Early feminists, now called "the first wave," fought against slavery while demanding the right to vote and hold office.

The hijacking of the term "feminism" by Betty Friedan and friends in the 1960s is referred to as the second wave. The third wave, beginning in the early ‘90s, is still underway and is supposedly an improvement on the second wave.

I don't see feminism in terms of "waves." I see it in terms of what is and is not true feminism. In the tradition of the suffragists, equity feminists simply believe in gender equality. Men are not degraded, and women are not viewed as perpetual victims. Family and motherhood are valued.

This is feminism.

Unfortunately, in academia and the media, gender feminists have come to define feminism. They generally support socialism, believe women are superior to men in some, if not all, regards and have a paradoxical belief that women are more often than not victims of men and a patriarchical society.

When you think of gender feminism, think Jodie Foster ("95 percent of women's experiences are about being a victim"), NOW leader Sheila Cronan ("Marriage constitutes slavery for women") and Gloria Steinem ("overthrowing capitalism is too small for us — we must overthrow the whole patriarch!").

This is not feminism.

The biggest travesty modern feminists perpetuate, bar none, is their fight for abortion "rights." The original feminists wouldn't recognize this concept of "women's rights." The phrase has gone from meaning our rights to vote and hold office, to our right to kill the unborn. Quite a leap.

Susan B. Anthony and Victoria Woodhull, America's first female presidential candidate, both called abortion "child murder." Alice Paul, who authored the original Equal Rights Amendment in 1923, called it "the ultimate exploitation of women," and Elizabeth Cady Stanton was another vocal opponent.

Modern feminists sympathize with women afraid of being inconvenienced for nine months, after which the child could be given to any number of loving families waiting to adopt.

I, on the other hand, sympathize with the girls (and boys) growing in their mother's womb, who in the first trimester of life can suck their thumb, turn somersaults, squint and frown, and who — for the sake of convenience — can legally be suctioned out of their mother through a tube tipped with a knife edge that, with 28 times the suction of a vacuum cleaner, tears them into small pieces.

I have news for NOW: If women are so independent and intelligent, and if, as one of my colleagues says, "our vaginas can handle anything thrown at us," then elective abortions aren't necessary. Cases involving the mother's health are obviously exceptional.

Not only do modern feminists get it horribly wrong on abortion and countless other issues, but they also waste time and energy on things that don't matter at all.

Just a few weeks ago, my feminist colleague got campus talking about the offensiveness of a certain insult men levy at each other. Who cares what men call each other? Instead of lamenting the offensiveness of slang uses of the word vagina, let's talk about the 140 million women in the world who have had theirs mutilated and the three million girls who will join that number this year.

It's time for women to reclaim the feminist movement, women who recognize and appreciate the freedoms we now have — including the freedom to make a career out of wife and motherhood — who defend life, who aren't caught up in political correctness and who are ready to turn their attention to the hundreds of millions of less-fortunate women in the rest of the world.

Ashley Reynolds is a political science senior.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

Anonymous
Fri Mar 19 2010 17:22
Yes, but that was GOOD feminism. It's quite simple really: good feminism = all the advances made by women that enable Ashley to be a woman attending college, including property rights, birth control (but not abortion), a workplace free of discrimination and sexual harassment. Bad feminism = all the advances made by women that Ashley doesn't approve of, because they don't (yet) apply to her.
Anonymous
Fri Mar 19 2010 14:18
If it wasn't for feminism, you wouldn't have ever had the opportunity to attend this university or write for this newspaper.
Meg
Fri Mar 12 2010 16:20
"Uh, Meg... abortion isn't some grand opportunity that allows women who got pregnant too early to go onto good lives."

That's exactly what it is. Not a fun experience, or a positive one, but unfortunately, a necessary one, and one with the power to fix broken lives.

" There's a little thing called adoption that can allow them to do the same thing."

And if that's what someone wants, more power to her. I am not about to critique that choice.

Meg
Fri Mar 12 2010 16:12
I did mangle one set of numbers; sorry. I'ts not one in four women who will have an abortion during her lifetime. It's one in three.
Anonymous
Fri Mar 12 2010 16:08
Uh, Meg... abortion isn't some grand opportunity that allows women who got pregnant too early to go onto good lives. There's a little thing called adoption that can allow them to do the same thing.
As for "when you resort to calling your opponents names, you've lost", I reference the countless comments here that label Ms. Reynolds "stupid", "bitter and hateful", "ignorant", and so forth.
The post a few comments down from a woman who has had an abortion and counseled women post-abortion is suggested reading for you.
Meg
Fri Mar 12 2010 16:07
That is simply not true. The Guttmacher Institute is the primary organization that collates data on reproductive issues, and that is where my facts come from. Based on the APA's findings in 2006, the primary reported feeling after abortion was 'relief and happiness." In the 1990s. the Royal College of Obstetricians found there was no higher risk of mental health problems in women after an abortion, even years and years later. None whatsoever. Don't take my word for it; you can google this stuff if you want. Look for objective medical studies published in journals or by professional organizations.
Anonymous
Fri Mar 12 2010 15:53
Meg,
Where do you get your so called "facts" from? Yes, initially for women who have had an abortion the first emotion they feel is relief. However, if you actually researched, studied, and spoke with post abortive women you would find that more than 80% of women deal with emotional trauma later on in life. For some it is six to nine months after their abortion. For others it is years before they even experience any type of emotional trauma. One of the misfortunes of this issue is that most woman admit when anonumously surveyed that they are too ashamed to speak with someone about their abortion and its affect on them emotionally. This leaves us with many questions and makes it very hard to understand the statistics because many of the women who are hurting are not speaking out. Do you even know how it feels to be silenced and trapped by pain like that? I assume not based upon your insensitive agenda based comments. You claim to represent equality and a woman's choice but you lack a great deal of compassion, something that I feel is truly necessary for women on both sides of the issue to possess.
Meg
Fri Mar 12 2010 14:03
The truth is that statistically, the most likely emotion a woman will have after an abortion is relief. Women who are forced into abortion they don't really want through circumstances are the most likely to be unhappy with that "choice," because it isn't really a choice for them; women for whom abortion is a genuine choice generally do really well, going on to further education, careers, opportunities, marriages, and future children that may well not have happened without the option of abortion. Look around you; one in four women have had abortions. They're mothers, wives, grandmothers, students, professors because of that choice.

(Eli, newsflash: when you run out of arguments and have to start to call your opponent names, that means you've lost.)

Eli Cash
Fri Mar 12 2010 13:36
Also, Meg... "all this talk about heartbeats and thumbsucking is just a cheap emotional point"... you're a b****.
Eli Cash
Fri Mar 12 2010 13:34
I can't think of anything more damaging to women's emotional health and image/reputation than abortion, so I can see why she is so passionate about it. Just because you disagree with her doesn't mean she is trying to oppress you... this is her brand of feminism, and if you are truly a feminist who believes feminists come from all ideologies, you shouldn't be railing against her. She didn't try to put you all in "waves" or categories, she clearly stated she doesn't see it in terms of waves. Most of you, based on your defense, fall into the category of equity feminist anyway, which is how she identifies herself. She clearly stated that the column was meant to address a broad generalization and conceptualization of the movement that exists in academia and the media - and it does. And it's unfortunate. This is what she is trying to fight. Stop acting like she is trying to oppress a gender that she is trying to uplift.
Bethany
Fri Mar 12 2010 13:28
"Some man has done a really great job of teaching you your place in the world, Ashley. Kudos for being a good little girl and knowing your place. Way to keep your gender down."
Susan, Ashley is one of my best friends. She spent two terms chairing one of OSU's largest student organizations (it became so large under her leadership), and serves as state-wide vice chairman of a federation of county organizations. She will graduate with a Bachelor's degree this summer and has been admitted to a Master's program. She has put herself through school, and is furthering her education. You don't know what her accomplishments are, you don't know what her goals are, but I can promise you no man has kept her down, and she isn't trying to oppress women.
an alum
Fri Mar 12 2010 10:59
"Terribly written. Try to finish a thought. Your intentions are good, however misguided. Women will never be equal to men. They are inferior in every aspect. Point to a woman who's success she achieved on her own and not by piggy backing on a man and I will change my perceptions. Until then, stop ranting about how women are the victims. You can't change human nature. "

Terrible comment -- please learn to respect the people around you. It's fine to disagree with the author, but to call an entire gender "inferior" is just ridiculous. May a woman never have the misfortune of being with you.

Anonymous
Fri Mar 12 2010 01:00
I have scammed through all 93 comments in relation to this article and I have yet to read a comment from one person who truly understands the "abortion" issue in its entirety. How many of you have ever experienced an unplanned pregnancy or counseled a woman who has? How many of you have experienced an abortion or counseled someone after they had one? Well, I have experienced all of the above and I have learned that this issue goes way deeper than woman's rights or a political battle. Women are hurting. Regardless of what you believe, unplanned pregnancy and abortion affect woman on a greater level than any man can ever truly understand. The unfortunate thing about this issue is that inaccurate responses are coming from both sides. The pro-choicers aren't willing to face the true, harsh facts about abortion and the extreme pro-lifers become so blinded by their passion that they forget to look at the woman who is dealing with the crisis. Yes, abortion is painful. It hurts and is physically uncomfortable. But, that aspect doesn't compare to half of the emotional scars that are left on women everyday from abortion. In all the counseling I have done I have yet to meet one woman that truly "wanted" to have an abortion. In fact, statistically most women choose abortion because they feel there is no other choice or option for them. They are afraid of what their family, friends, or others will think of them. They feel they are unable to provide for a baby. They are afraid it will affect their relationship with the father of the baby. They fear they will be unable to finish school. The list goes on and on. But the point is this: I see it everyday. Women allow fear to make their choice for them. They become so fearful that they feel trapped and left without support or choices. Tell me how this truly even represents a "woman's choice". It doesn't. Making a decision based on hoplessness and helplessness does not represent TRUE choice. Women deserve to be educated on all of their options and they need to hear that someone will be there for them no matter what. Pro lifers, if you really want to make a change in the world of abortion, then start reaching out to these women! Don't judge them, be there for them. Offer them the resources and education to empower them to make positive life choices. And Pro choicers, if you truly believe in accurate information and preventing unplanned pregnancy, don't be afraid to look these women in the eyes and tell them the truth about abortion. Most clinics never even share the information they are legally required to in a way where it gives the woman the "full truth". They do this because they know that less women would choose abortion if they truly understood the physical and emotional risks involved, or if they knew what the procedure itself consists of. I have had an abortion and I was never given this information. I believe a truly informed decision is the smartest one a person can make. But we musn't be afraid to empower these women with truth!!! Both sides of this issue need to wake up and see that this issue is more than just an abortion/feminism issue. It is an issue of poverty, sexual health, unhealthy relationships, and self esteem issues. Please attempt to truly become connected to the heart of this issue before you are so quick to judge one person's beliefs. It becomes a totally different ball game once you experience the reality of this issue firsthand. It almost seems silly to argue for or against the rights of others before truly attempting to understand what these women AND babies face.
Jimmy
Thu Mar 11 2010 14:07
Against the grain,
Didn't Mr. James Cooper praise Sen. Tom Coburn and his health care efforts at Obama's health care summit in his op-ed last week? I could have sworn that I saw that. I guess he'll return to calling Coburn the spawn of Satan when he returns from spring break. And, congrats on attending OSU for four years; somehow, in this last year, you managed to miss Shane Leach, Scott Damico, Thomas Lahey, and Jordan Sligar (a columnist last semester), all conservative columnists who Mr. Cooper sought out and asked to write for the Forum. Those columnists appear each week alongside their liberal counterparts.

A public intellectual? You're a tool.

Susan B.
Thu Mar 11 2010 10:23
Some man has done a really great job of teaching you your place in the world, Ashley. Kudos for being a good little girl and knowing your place.

Way to keep your gender down.

Meg
Wed Mar 10 2010 22:26
You can't simultaneously claim that a fertilized egg is as precious as a baby and then say most embryos and fetuses are *more* precious the more they develop. If you're claiming a new human being at fertilization, then birth control pills are equally as abortive as a so-called "partial birth abortion," and all this talk about heartbeats and thumbsucking is just a cheap emotional point. Which is it?
Eli Cash
Wed Mar 10 2010 21:25
Feminist = an ugly woman with minimal female charm who can't get a man so resorts to spending her life pissed off at them.

Seriously, find me one attractive feminist leader. Hillary Clinton is the best looking one and I think most people would agree that Bill has more feminine characteristics than her.

raleigh st. clair
Wed Mar 10 2010 21:24
right on girl
Anonymous
Wed Mar 10 2010 21:02
How do you come up with your facts? Or are you just pulling all of this out of your ass? You obviously know nothing of feminism.....or reality.
H.
Wed Mar 10 2010 20:51
This is one of the most ignorant, misinformed, propaganda-ridden pieces of drivel I've ever forced myself to finish reading. I find it astonishing and disappointing the O'Colly even printed this misinformation.

Points for Ms. Reynolds:

1) The term feminism was not hijacked by the second or third wave of said movement. I know it's a scary concept for people with your beliefs, but social movements evolve. I consider myself a third wave feminist and none of the slanderous nonsense you used to describe modern feminists fits me or anyone else I know.

2) If women aren't given sovereignty over their own body, what's the point of having any rights at all? My body = my choice. Keep your morals away from me - I don't share them and you don't have to right to force me to do so.

3) Just because a term doesn't offend you doesn't mean that it doesn't matter. You are not a representative for all of our gender, and sexist terms really hurt, offend, and oppress a lot of women.

Maybe if you put down your copy of "Going Rogue" and talked to enough real life feminists to get an idea of what the movement was actually about, you wouldn't publicly embarrass yourself with diatribes such as this.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In