College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Ron Paul versus the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy

By Brandon McVey

Forum Columnist

|

Published: Thursday, August 27, 2009

Updated: Thursday, August 27, 2009

During this financial crisis, rarely a day passes without the media reporting on some action the Federal Reserve takes. As a central bank, the Fed is responsible for the monetary policy of the United States.


Monetary policy is conducted by manipulating the money supply, which has important implications for the broader economy.


This responsibility  has created active campaigns that attack and seek to discredit the institution.


The interesting, yet failed, presidential bid of Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul has led to the creation of www.AuditTheFed.com, a Web site devoted to such attacks. Most spread misinformation, and it’s important to understand the financial institutions that impact your day-to-day life.


Popularized on the Internet, propagandist documentaries like “Zeitgeist” argue the Fed exists as an unconstitutional entity. This argument suggests that because the Federal Reserve is a private entity, it has no constitutional right to control the money supply — i.e. currency.


The Fed exists as a system with 12 regional banks and a central Board of Governors. Although the presidents of the individual Fed banks are privately employed, the president appoints members of the Board of Governor and the Senate then moves to confirm them.


The Federal Reserve System is a mix of public and private components and the Federal Open Market Committee, which sets monetary policy, includes the seven Board members and five regional bank presidents on a rotating basis.


Though the Fed isn’t an entirely private organization, questions regarding its constitutionality persist. However, the landmark 1819 Supreme Court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, established the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States, which was a private banking institution chartered by the federal government. The Fed’s mixture of public and private components was innovative and is precisely why the Fed has lasted longer than the other two national banks in our country’s history.


Paul authored HR 1207, a bill calling for a full audit of the Fed, which has collected 282 cosponsors and generated a similar bill in the Senate. The Government Accountability Office and an independent accounting firm already audit the Fed’s operations in accordance with Section 11B of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.


Paul’s bill addresses the fact that no authority audits monetary policy decisions.  Though the Federal Open Market Committee is not audited, it is transparent because the Freedom of Information act requires all meeting minutes are made available online.


Nevertheless, the question persists as to why this important aspect of the Federal Reserve is not audited.


Ben Bernanke’s June 25 congressional testimony addressed Paul’s bill should it become law. Bernanke said the bill “would effectively be a takeover of monetary policy by the Congress [and] a repudiation of the independence of the Federal Reserve, which would be highly destructive to the stability of the financial system, the dollar and our national economic system.”


The independence of a central bank is essential, and there is a large body of economic literature to support that assertion. In fact, many of the great failures of central banks that have led to hyperinflation, such as Weimar Germany or Zimbabwe, happened when politics took control of monetary policy.


I believe Paul has honest intentions, but the real effect of his proposal would be more government control.

Brandon McVey is a finance, German and accounting senior.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

31 comments

Your name
Mon Aug 31 2009 13:50
No wall 'o text here
We handed out a couple trillion dollars and want to know where its going does that make us "wingnuts" real "changes" are coming folks, one way or another, and the power is inherently in the people..
Thomas D Dowling
Sun Aug 30 2009 19:58
The Federal Reserve Board is not “a thoroughly public entity.” The Board of Governors is the part of the Federal Reserve System that is responsible for supervising the private banks. There are seven members on the board. Every two years, a new board member is appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate to serve a 14 year term.

There are twelve “Fed Scam” Central Banks which are privately owned by a limited group of people from around the world. Congress was given the right to create and regulate the value of money in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, but has delegated its power to ‘The Fed Scam” System. These banks create money, lend it back to us through our banks, and collect hundreds of billions of dollars in interest each year.

The Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913, shortly after the 16th amendment was ratified. The 16th amendment allowed our country to collect the taxes required to pay the annual dividends to the Fed’s shareholders, who bought their original 300 shares for only $100 per share. By law, the United States can easily abolish the Fed by buying back these shares at a cost of “only” $450 million and replace the current national debt with non-interest bearing currency as it becomes due.

“The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.” –Abraham Lincoln

http://www.tomdavidd.com/blog/

Bandwagon Patriot
Sun Aug 30 2009 15:58
It is hilarious that in this time of massive economic unrest due to the banking industry destroying the economy singlehandedly, a bunch of internet libertarians are focusing all their vitriol against the Federal Reserve.

None of you want to regulate private banks?

Thomas D Dowling
Sun Aug 30 2009 07:09
Anybody who tries to “water-down” or stall these bills is clearly a Traitor and “Sold Out” the United States of America! Also, why is our government secretly moving OUR Money to the IMF? Where is the missing One Trillion point 200 Billion dollars?

Why would “We the People” want to compromise or negotiate anything concerning the complete audit of OUR Money? Does everybody “get it”!

“The Fed Scam” is Truly Criminal and must be totally Abolished! This Money and any Interest belongs to “We the People”! America, do not be deceived!

The only real financial crisis of the U.S.A. is hiding in the audit of “The Fed Scam”!

Audit “The Fed Scam” bills HR 1207 must pass in The House and S 604 must pass in The Senate immediately! Any Representative or Senator that does not vote in favor of and support these bills or tries to “water-down” or stall these bills is clearly a Traitor and “Sold Out” the United States of America!

“Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder.” --George Washington

Does our government think that we are now here to serve them? Are they out of their minds?

Some of our leaders today have acquired a very “twisted” view of their roles. Do we now have those who can no longer handle the power we entrusted them? Why have they abused and taken advantage of us? Do they no longer think they are accountable to us and believe they can do whatever they please? Our “public servants” have developed a “spirit of insubordination” and have gotten way out of control! This has to stop right now! This is ridiculous! Enough is Enough!

“Congress can revoke central bank’s charter ‘at any time’” --Ron Paul

http://www.tomdavidd.com/blog/

Anybody who supports “The Fed Scam” is clearly a Traitor to “We the People” of the United States of America!

Dave in Oz
Sun Aug 30 2009 07:04
"Monetary policy is conducted by manipulating the money supply, which has important implications for the broader economy.

This responsibility has created active campaigns that attack and seek to discredit the institution."

How dumb are you sir, the land of the "free and the brave" is becoming the land of the "meek and the slave" thanks to ignorant folks like you who do not know how the world of finance and Government work.

A redeemable precious metal standard will make you free again, study financial history and give yourself the opportunity to be free again.

Mark Bohannon
Sat Aug 29 2009 23:22
I lost faith in Ron Paul when he became a "birther" crackpot and started echoing Republican talking points during the last presidential election.
Your name
Sat Aug 29 2009 18:01
Any monetary system base on a privately owned central banking system is a fraud: a simple Ponzi scheme.

Here’s how it works.

With the exception of coins minted by the government which makes up about 0.072% of the money supply, all money is created as debt, extended into the economy as loans and bonds. In the case of the Federal Reserve the debt is US. Government bonds, and the money created is paper comprising about 2% of the total money supply. In the case of private banks it is loans and bonds issued to individuals, institutions and corporations the money is intangible, checkbook money comprising 98% of the supply. The Federal Reserve and commercial banks create only the principal of these loans, so the amount of debt equals the amount of money. But loan contracts require the repayment of the principal plus the payment of interest. The difficulty in the system, the goose in the banking system’s jet engine, so to speak, is interest. Because no one creates additional money to pay the interest, any privately owned monetary system is fatally flawed.

Viewed as a whole that is considering all loans, if the principal is repaid, there is no money left over to pay the interest. On the other hand if the interest is paid from the principal that is the money supply, there is insufficient money to repay the principal. Either way, it is impossible to repay the principal and also pay the interest.

In order to make the system appears to work, new loans must be originated creating new money being used to service old loan obligations, the process expanding the total amount of debt, requiring even more and larger loans in an exponential spiral eventually reaching a point where new money cannot be creates rapidly enough to meet demands and like all such Ponzi schemes the system collapses. The collapse is termed the business cycle by the banking industry.

Bandwagon Patriot
Sat Aug 29 2009 14:02
Ron Paul brings out the worst internet posters. You guys are all morons.
Your name
Sat Aug 29 2009 13:31
Sure would be good to get the Fed audited as stated in Bill HR1207 not some watered down version like Bernanke
would like to manipulate! When that is done I hope we are able to abolish "The Fed" very quickly!
Paul Revere
Sat Aug 29 2009 13:27
Global War and Dying Democracy by Andrew Marshall
The new system being formed is not one based upon any notion of competition or “free markets” or “socialist morality”, but is, instead a system based upon consolidation of power and wealth; thus, the fewer the better; one government, one central bank, one army, one currency,one authority, one ruler. This is a much more “efficient” and “controllable” system, and thus requires a much smaller population or class to run it, as well as a much smaller population to serve it. Also, with such a system,a smaller global population would be ideal for the rulers, for it limits their risk, in terms of revolt, uprising, and revolution, and created a more manageable population. In this new capitalist system, the end goal is not profit, but power. It was through the central banking system that the most powerful figures and individuals ( Elitists ) in the world were able to consolidate power, controlling both industry and governments.These figures would collapse economies, destroying industry and thus, profits; bankrupt countries and collapse their political structures, destroying a base for the exercise of power; but in doing so, they would consolidate their authority over these governments and industry,wiping out competition and eliminating dissent.These are the main figures in the current reorganization of world order. Those who are driven by the lust for power often eliminate and remove all of those who helped them reach such a position.Power alters the psychology of the individual that holds it.Once power is achieved, and with no more power to gain, the obsession turns to the preservation of power & the paranoia of losing it.Power is a cancer; it eats away at its host.The greater the power held, the more cancerous it is, the more malignant it becomes.Power must be shared among all people the risk carried thus becomes a risk to all,and there is a more effective means through which everyone can act as a check against the abuse of power.
Gary North
Sat Aug 29 2009 13:06
CONCLUSION

The FED has never had to play defense. It has had a free ride. The free ride is over.

The general public has still not heard of the FED. The FED still has the advantage of invisibility. But it is losing that invisibility. This is not going to change.

The FED is a legitimate target for people who think the government botches the economy. It is the classic example of the much-praised government-business alliance. It is the consummate model of that alliance. When it fails to achieve its twin official goals of low unemployment and low price inflation, millions of its economic victims will figure out who the culprit is.

End the Fed.

Gary North
Sat Aug 29 2009 13:04
The Fed is on the Defensive.I do not recall this in my lifetime. A 282 majority in the House of Representatives has co-signed H.R. 1207, a bill introduced by Ron Paul to have the Federal Reserve System audited by an independent government agency, the Comptroller General's office. The bill has been bottled up in committee by Barney Frank, who has insisted that he is doing this in order to better coordinate consideration of the best way to gain greater transparency from the Federal Reserve. He has not said that he favors an independent audit of the FED.It would be easy for Congressman Frank to hold hearings on the bill. This would allow Dr. Paul to bring in expert witnesses on the FED to make the case for an independent audit. It would get a lot of YouTube play. It would be the first time since the replacement of eccentric Congressman Wright Patman in 1975 as the chairman of the House Banking Committee that the FED has been exposed to anything like serious criticism in Congress. (Patman, an inflationist and a greenbacker, hated the FED. He was chairman of the House Banking Committee, 1965–75.) Congressman Frank has yet to announce hearings.There was a posting on the DailyPaul site that Frank will hold hearings soon. Someone heard it on the radio. I will believe it when I see the YouTube videos.The FED in June hired a public relations expert, Linda Robinson, to deal with Congress. She was formerly a lobbyist for Enron. I have little doubt that it was H.R. 1207 that forced the FED into this move.Now Ron Paul's book, End the Fed, is about to be published. It is expected to become a best-seller. Think about this. There have been books attacking the Federal Reserve System for over ninety years, but they have been written by obscure people who no one in the general public has heard of. They have not sold well. They have not been written by someone who persuaded over half of the House of Representatives to support a bill to audit the FED. They have not been written by someone who once raised over $30 million in a run for President.This is unprecedented. For the first time in the history of the Federal Reserve System, there are literally millions of people who have heard of the FED and who would like to see it shut down. There have been academic and investment critics of this or that policy of the FED, most notably Milton Friedman, who criticized the FED for not inflating enough, 1930–33. But there has never been a serious audience ready to listen to arguments on why a system of 12 private banks should oversee monetary policy, and why one of them, the New York Federal Reserve Bank, should execute this policy without having to answer to anyone. THE BLOOMBERG LAWSUITThe Bloomberg news service has sued the Board of Governors of the FED under the Freedom of Information Act. The lawsuit says that it is illegal for the Board of Governors to refuse to release information on which banks have received financial aid from the FED.The Board of Governors countered with this argument. The New York FED is a privately owned entity. It executes monetary policy. It is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. The FED also argued that the banking system would be threatened by the release of this information. This case went to court. The judge ruled on August 24 that the Board of Governors of the FED must make this information public no later than August 31.On August 26, the FED asked the judge not to enforce her ruling. Why not? Because it would be bad for the banking system. She had heard that argument before. Well, what else? The Board of Governors' lawyer insisted that the Board has no knowledge of what the New York FED – its legal agent – really does. The lawyer said, "We don't control the system of record-keeping in New York." She insisted that the Board of Governors just cannot find out what the New York FED did with the money in time to meet the deadline.Apparently, the Board of Governors, a government agency, has taken seriously Jesus' words regarding charity (alms): But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly (Matthew 6:3–4).The two FEDS, the government one and the private one, were surely involved in the charity business, to the tune of a trillion dollars or so. This was a system of handouts on an unprecedented scale. The Father in Washington has surely rewarded the FED in the past. The FED expects more of the same in the future. But now this pesky lawsuit forces an opening of the books.Is the lawyer's argument credible? Perhaps the judge will not regard it as credible. So, the FED had another argument. The FED wants her to wait until the case can be heard on appeal. But there was a hitch. The FED did not say when it intends to appeal. Here is the FED, with a court ruling against it, and with the clock ticking, admitting that it has no date set to file an appeal. Its lawyers...
Steve Hanke
Sat Aug 29 2009 12:43
Betting Against the Fed

The federal reserve is scrambling to convince the public that it is not a secretive institution that acts at the behest of Wall Street, but the public isn't buying the Fed's line. According to a Gallup Poll conducted in mid-July, the Fed received the lowest approval rating of the nine government agencies and departments evaluated--even lower than the Internal Revenue Service.

Trying to show the softer side of the central bank, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke took us on a tour of his hometown of Dillon, S.C. on a 60 Minutes segment in March, and in July he fielded questions from newsman Jim Lehrer and an auditorium full of people for more than an hour in a televised town hall meeting.

Both events were carefully choreographed--and unprecedented. During his face time Bernanke explained many things, including the Fed's strategy for shrinking its balance sheet and withdrawing the ocean of excess reserves from the banking system. Unfortunately, he did not address my main beef with the bank: that it clings to a flawed inflation-targeting regime with a horrible history of monetary policy failures.

In pursuit of inflation targeting--the idea that monetary policy should be geared to keeping the annual core inflation rate in a range of, say, 0% to 2%--the Fed has been much more tolerant of inflation than it has of deflation. In November 2002 then governor Bernanke and then chairman Alan Greenspan misdiagnosed a benign cyclical dip in the price level. Fearing deflation, the Fed panicked, and by July 2003 pushed the Fed funds rate down to a then record low of 1%, where it stayed for a year, allowing a flood of liquidity to hit the economy and the housing bubble to inflate. The Fed ignored economic theory developed by Austrian economists such as Nobel laureate Friedrich Hayek, who demonstrated that there was such a thing as a "good deflation," which occurs during a productivity boom. It was just such a boom, coupled with an improvement in the U.S. terms of trade, that was putting downward pressure on the core inflation rate.

More monetary blundering occurred after the Dubai G7 Summit in September 2003, when the U.S. got other Western nations on board to pressure China to allow its currency to appreciate against the dollar. The 2004 elections were approaching, and the outcome of key contests in the Rust Belt, according to President Bush's advisors, hinged on whether China could be forced to alter its fixed yuan-dollar exchange rate of 8.28. Surprisingly, the Fed was drawn into what is normally the exclusive domain of the U.S. Treasury--the dollar's exchange rate.

The Bush Administration's weak dollar policy, endorsed by the Fed, brought with it not only a dollar rout but also an explosion in commodity prices. Perhaps the commodity price surge explains why the Fed was behind the curve in lowering the Fed funds rate--something that pushed the economy into a steep recession well before the collapse of Lehman Brothers one year ago. By the start of 2007 weak aggregate demand was signaling a recession, but the Fed kept the funds rate at 5.25% until mid-September 2007. It's not surprising that the economy tanked.

Never mind these missteps. The Obama Administration has proposed rewarding the Fed for its failures by crowning it the nation's systemic regulator--a sort of financial regulatory czar. But many in Congress demand a closer peek inside the central bank.

Congressman Ron Paul (R--Tex.), along with 282 cosponsors, has introduced a bill that would require the Government Accountability Office to audit the Fed. The Fed claims that auditing would imperil its independence.

Milton Friedman weighed in on central bank independence in a 1962 essay, "Should There Be an Independent Monetary Authority?" Friedman's conclusion: "The case against a fully independent central bank is strong indeed." As for letting in some sunshine, the late senator Patrick Moynihan (D--N.Y.) had it right: "Secrecy is for losers."

As we await the outcome of the battle over Fed transparency, we should ponder a recent conclusion of Carnegie Mellon's Allan Meltzer. As the author of the authoritative A History of the Federal Reserve, he has observed that the Fed responds "decisively to the unemployment rate but not to the inflation rate." As long as unemployment remains elevated, expect loose monetary reins and more inflation.

Protect yourself with some exchange-traded funds. Buy SPDR Gold Shares (GLD, 93; expense ratio, 0.4%), which tracks the metal. I also recommend diversified commodity ETFs like the iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG, 30; 0.75%) and PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC, 23; 0.75%)

I have my money on "We the People", how about you Brandon?

fairmark
Sat Aug 29 2009 12:39
The only REAL power-player, Jesus Christ, said not to worry. Accept Him and go on living.
auditfed
Sat Aug 29 2009 11:15
finance and accounting seniors should leave the economics to the economists.
Finance and accounting are two systems that got us into this mess.
It's the economists who now have to figure it out.
if you don;t know what you`re talking about, keep your mouth shut
Henry Miller
Sat Aug 29 2009 10:03
The secrecy of the Fed doesn't assure its independence, it just protects the identities of those trying to influence it.
bob
Sat Aug 29 2009 05:48
Is this article a joke, or is this guy a real traitor?
Bandwagon Patriot
Sat Aug 29 2009 01:30
I don't really see what is going to be accomplished by auditing the Federal Reserve. The government audits the Department of Defense all the time and the DoD can't account for billions in dollars, yet nothing ever happens.

And the DoD kills people. You think there'd be an uproar.

Brandon McVey
Fri Aug 28 2009 23:37
Switzerland, actually. I lived in Switzerland.
ugg
Fri Aug 28 2009 23:13
This guy is from Socialist Germany what do you expect. My freedom is my money and if the fed or the congress steels any more of my freedom then I may have to claim bankrupty. Time to hang some tea bags on my rearview mirror.






log out