College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Republicans fuss over reform

Forum Columnist

Published: Friday, March 12, 2010

Updated: Friday, March 12, 2010

Could it be that the health care debate is finally coming to a close?

This might seem like wishful thinking, but recent developments in Congress might point to an end to this monstrous legislative battle. With the prospect of a reconciliation attempt looming ever-closer, reform seems to be approaching, as well.

Reconciliation is a legislative maneuver that allows Congress to pass budget bills more easily. Instead of the 60 votes needed in Senate to pass a budget bill, it would need a simple majority to pass if this method is used.

Republicans are doing everything they can to keep Democrats from using reconciliation, which is interesting considering they’ve used it more often than Democrats. Since 1974, there have been 22 reconciliation bills, 14 of which a Republican-controlled Congress initiated, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.

Debate over the legitimacy of using this procedural maneuver has caused a feeding frenzy in Congress.

Democrats who once denounced use of reconciliation now defend it.

Likewise, Republicans who supported bypassing opposition with its use now accuse Democrats of “steamrolling” the bill through Congress.

“You can say that this process has been used before, and that would be right. But it’s never been used for anything like this,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.

Interestingly, health reform bills are exactly what reconciliation has been used for in the past. Reforms pertaining to health insurance, nursing home standards, Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program have all been passed in this manner.

The Republicans have been asking to be ignored throughout the entire health care debate. Eyeing the 2010 midterm elections, the GOP has worked to disrupt debate at every turn. This might score them political points back home, but it does little in the way of actually helping the people of this country.

I applaud Democratic leaders for doing what they can to pass much-needed reforms. If reconciliation is the way to do it, I say go for it. It’s about time we actually do something about our failed health care system, with or without support from the Republicans.

Aside from the fact that health care reforms will make health insurance more accessible to millions of more Americans, Rush Limbaugh has said he will leave the country if it passes. Though I am reluctant to encourage the departure of such a valuable ally of the Democratic Party, I can’t help but relish the idea of never having to listen to his idiotic retorts again.

No matter how the bill passes, the American people will soon forget the usual rhetoric that Republicans have regurgitated throughout the debate. The need for reform far outweighs these empty threats.

“[Democrats] are going to have to live with it for the rest of their lives,” warned Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, last week.

After Democrats hang on to their majority in Congress and see the bill save millions of lives, living with reform should be pretty easy.

Eric Smith is a political science and public relations junior.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments Log in to Comment

Bandwagon Patriot
Thu Mar 18 2010 22:49
The military is the worst ran branch of the government. It's a trillion dollar disaster that hasn't won a war since WW2. If there's any government program that needs to be disbanded it's the military. Coincidentally, it's the most in bed with the private sector.
redokie
Sat Mar 13 2010 10:14
It saddens me to see a young, likely intelligent writer like Mr. Smith indicate that the federal government can do a better job of running a healthcare system than the private sector can. Other than the military, which is one of the few things that the feds should be in charge of and does have its warts, I don't know of an agency of the government that has run an efficient operation. Post Office? Losing money right and left. Education Department? Billions spent on education and the US ranks way down the list of so-called developed countries in learning basics. Social Security? Headed for bankruptcy. Medicare (a government-run healthcare system, by the way)? Graft-ridden, and in the hole. I could go on, but you get the picture.

Many years ago, monopolies evolved in the private sector. This was not a good thing, and it was incumbent on the government (and rightly so) to provide enough regulation to assure fair competition. Yet, when the government has a monopoly on a segment of the economy, it's looked upon as a good thing. How do you explain that?

Government control of healthcare will assure less innovation, raise costs even more and put today's college age citizens and their kids in debt for the rest of their lives. How do I know? Just look at the record. Mr. Smith, why do you think that this will be the exception to the rule?

Aaron
Fri Mar 12 2010 09:13
I still don't see how anyone can blame republicans for preventing the healthcare bill from passing. Even if they all said no, it would still pass. The democrats have been having problems finding votes within their own party to pass this legislation.

Even when the democrats had a supermajority in the senate, they still had to bribe their own party members to vote for the bill. So a healthcare bill that was questionable at best is now pork-laden with special deals for a handful of states.

Add to the fact that there is such distrust between democratic members of the house and senate that the senate version currently does not have enough votes in the house to even get the bill to the point of reconciliation in the senate.

The dems have only themselves to blame for not being able to push a bill through.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In