College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Don’t stop believin’

Published: Monday, October 26, 2009

Updated: Monday, October 26, 2009 03:10

The war in Afghanistan is pushing us to the precipice of our country’s history. We must do what so many other generations of Americans have done before us — exhibit unflappable resolve, continue the fight and win.


As of Friday, the Washington Post reports 4,335 deaths and 31,536 injuries to U.S. troops since the beginning of the war in Iraq, and according to the National Priorities Project, the United States has spent nearly $650 billion during the war in Iraq — the cost of our operations in Afghanistan are approximately $230 billion.


All this money and manpower could have created a stable Afghanistan by now.


The biggest consequence of Operation Iraqi Freedom isn’t as easy to quantify.


The toll of two wars over the span of eight years has left Americans war weary. Frankly, our choice to fight a war in Iraq has placed a fog over our collective consciousness. We’ve forgotten Afghanistan isn’t a war we elected to fight; this is a war we have to fight.


In a recent speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, President Obama agreed, declaring, “[This] is not a war of choice; this is a war of necessity. . . This is not only a war worth fighting. This is fundamental to the defense of our people.”


The Taliban and al-Qaeda are the gravest threat to America’s security. Even before their attacks on the World Trade Center, al-Qaeda engaged in lower profile terrorist attacks that claimed American lives, while the Taliban gave them protection.


Even now, both al-Qaeda and the Taliban continue to operate in the country, as well as in neighboring Pakistan.


Around 100,000 coalition forces occupy the region. They’re equipped with world-class armor and superior weaponry, and even that doesn’t stop our enemy from trying to claim territory in both countries through intimidation and violence.


If we leave the region, it will only get worse. Even European leaders see the folly in leaving.


“Leaving Afghanistan behind would once again turn the country into a training ground for al-Qaeda,” NATO Secretary General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen said. “The pressure on nuclear-armed Pakistan would be tremendous.”


If it sounds like a doomsday scenario, it’s because it is a doomsday scenario—one that could likely come true.


If al-Qaeda gets its hands on a nuclear weapon, they will use it and the devastation would be catastrophic. Also, both the Taliban and al-Qaeda would use our exit to claim victory. It would enable other extremists to be recruited to pick up arms or to strap bombs to their bodies.


Both Obama and General Stanley McChrystal, the U.S. forces commander in Afghanistan, understand that our enemies can’t be eliminated. However, they can be minimized to the point that a strong and responsible government can take hold in Afghanistan — one that can defend itself against insurgent attacks.


For the first time in a long time, we have a clear strategy in Afghanistan: hunt down the enemy, protect the citizenry, and accelerate the training of Afghan armed forces.


McChrystal’s strategy will require more troops and eventually more money.


“Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the near-term (next 12 months) — while Afghan security capacity matures — risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible,” McChrystal maintains.


Mr. President, give the general everything he needs, and then more. This is a war we can’t afford to lose.

Scott is a political science and sports media major.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

12 comments

Bandwagon Patriot
Sat Oct 31 2009 21:47
Taliban never attacked the United States. Please learn to differentiate between Taliban and al Qaeda. Not all Muslims are the same.
A real supporter
Thu Oct 29 2009 16:13
People always say by bringing our troops home that they care more for them but it's not the case. My sister is in Afghanistan, and she doesn't want to come home. I get her letters every day. I mean she wants to come home but she wants to protect this country more. I read the other article about that guy's friend, and I was appalled that anyone could call themselves a supporter of someone and then say they're fighting for nothing, that their lives are meaningless right now. My sister Sarah joined the military because she's proud to fight for her country; she knows what she's fighting for. It's unfair for Obama not to send troops to help her! It's unfair to cost more lives each day because he's refusing to back up what he started! That's what's unfair! He promised that and soldiers are dying every day because he refused to give them the support they need. Yes I want Sarah home, but I also want her fight to have a chance. And I think she's there for a good reason. She's protecting us from the Taliban, from people who could drop a nuclear weapon on us if we give them the chance. They are maniacal. They are not going to leave us alone. I'm glad she's there, as much as i want her to come home. Her life has meaning, a meaning she chose. I love Sarah. I love this country. Thanks for supporting both.
Jeffrey Imm
Tue Oct 27 2009 19:20
Scott - I understand your points, but we should be asking who and what we are fighting. The U.S. State Dept today lists the same Afghanistan govt we are supporting as one of the greatest violators of religious freedom in the world. A few weeks ago members of the U.S. military leadership have been talking about negotiating with the Taliban, and a bill is currently in the U.S. Congress to "pay" "militants" from "switching" their support from the Taliban. You can imagine how long that will last. Until and unless we ask the really TOUGH strategic question about WHY we are there, the tactical questions on who, what, where, and when are really not consequential. We seek to protect the citizenry from the Taliban. But where do we think the Taliban come from? This is the same citizenry where the elected Afghan parliament calls for the death penalty for those who leave Islam and that seeks to legalize rape of Muslim women. It is like trying to defend the citizenry of 1960s Mississippi from the Ku Klux Klan but refusing to acknowledge the real problem of white supremacism.
Russ
Mon Oct 26 2009 20:54
First of all, we are not in Vietnam. This is a different war, fought for different purposes. Soldiers make decisions to join the military, knowing the consequences (whether we like to admit and see that or not.)

Secondly, Trish, no war is unwinnable. You're right; religion might be a motivator. It's a motivator that's cost civilian American lives prior. Do you think that's going to stop by us giving up? You're right. We have to have a solid exit plan. There has to be a government in place that can combat the civil unrest that's there, and no one is saying we should just leave without any strategy. It's a tough situation, but it's not one that we should just give up and leave to the fates, hoping that it will get better on its own. Let's make a difference now, when we can concentrate all of our efforts there--and win. We have a strategy, a definable one. I agree with Scott. Let's give McChrystal, and our nation, the chance it deserves to create peace.

Trish Emig
Mon Oct 26 2009 18:51
And when we leave, what then? These are religious and civil wars. We have NO BUSINESS there. The best thing that we can do as a nation is provide these frailing, angry countries avenues for working through their historical fights and poverty levels, not "hunt down our enemies" and kill them. We kill too many other innocent people in the process which only creates more anger and vindictiveness towards the U.S.A. Vicke is correct . . . in that history has shown the cruel, emotional conflicts in these countries. And Pakistan's terraine will prevent any "real" victory.
a friend
Mon Oct 26 2009 18:49
i would just like to say i was a teen in the era of vietnam . i watched as my friends were forced to go to war and were killed fighting for a cause this country did not believe in. for sixteen years we were in a civil war with vietnam and our brave men and women were not even sure who there enemies were. i saw so many that came home with scars so deep they would never heal / legs and arms missing / exposure to agent orange /babies born so deformed that many did not make it . the things i saw made me want to do something so i went to nursing school and worked for years with vietnam vets . america needs to end the two wars we are in now and bring our men and women home. we did not learn from vietnam and so we have made the same mistake again we are in a civil war that no one knows how to end. president obama needs to end this war and do as we did in vietnam /just walk away.there will never be a true winner in these wars only more bloodshed and heartache . charity and phillp my heart is with both of you,mama cooper
Russ
Mon Oct 26 2009 18:31
Nice article.
Will
Mon Oct 26 2009 12:58
If Scott needs to a crash course about Afghanistan's history, then so does the president--and his top military advisors about Afghanistan. To say Scott doesn't understand the issue is unfair. He may not agree with you that because Afghanistan has a history of violence that America should just give up the fight there. What most people fail to realize is that Afghanistan and Iraq are different wars. They're fought for different purpose. Yes, no war is easy but because we're faced with difficuilties, does that mean we just cave? Do we just say it's ok to have nuclear weapons against a power that definitely distrusts and dislikes us? At what point do we stand up and protect ourselves? This war is imperative. It's not Iraq, as Scott notes. If we leave Afghanistan, we put ourselves in peril. We lose this moment, perhaps the only moment we have (as McChrystal says above) to make a difference in this region.
Vicke Adams
Mon Oct 26 2009 12:23
I think Scott needs to learn more about Afghanistan's history and people. The history of this region does not give me reason to believe that we can ever accomplish anything useful with a military presence. I see nothing patriotic about supporting a continued war effort in either Afghanistan or Iraq.
Cara
Mon Oct 26 2009 12:08
My brother's in Afghanistan right now, and I'm glad he's defending us. Its a scary time in our nation. I wish more people understood what's at stake in this war. It's not just a foreign country we're invading for fun. No one seems to understand to figure out why the president feels as he does. Its nice to hear someone does.
Dennis
Mon Oct 26 2009 03:24
"Even European leaders see the folly in leaving."

You are quite the ethnocentrist, Scott...

Jaclyn Cosgrove
Mon Oct 26 2009 03:19
This column is part of a three-part series in today's opinion section. Make sure to check out the other two columns as well. We appreciate your support.
Thanks,
- Jaclyn

Jaclyn Cosgrove
Web editor
The Daily O'Collegian
jaclyn.cosgrove@ocolly.com







log out