Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Campaign tactics leave SGA results inconclusive

Student Government Reporter

Published: Thursday, March 4, 2010

Updated: Thursday, March 4, 2010 01:03

Voting for the SGA Presidential elections officially ended at 5 p.m. Wednesday.

According to the numbers, Kelly Offutt and Derek Barchenger received the most votes. But some difficulties have arisen and Offutt and Barchenger have yet to be deemed the winners.

"We cannot officially name a winner," said Joey Crouch, head of the elections agency. "Our overall goal is to ensure that the student's vote is being heard. If we have any reason to believe that there has been interference, we're going to look into it. We are here to make sure everything is fair."

Investigations are currently taking place concerning campaigning tactics. Despite expectations of a "Clean Campaign", the elections agency is looking into infractions made by candidates.

According to the president of the Residence Hall Association, Chelsea McGuire, Offutt and Barchenger were seen campaigning in the hallways of Drummond, Kerr and Village D.

"The reason why I'm taking action is because the residents have come to me and would like it taken care of," McGuire said. "I feel like SGA and the election board really need to be taking note of this. If SGA won't take the concerns of RHA into consideration, RHA won't be able to take SGA into consideration either."

According to Section 4.5.3.2 of Title 9 in the SGA bylaws, "campaign tactics must abide by university regulations, including Residential Life and Greek Life policies."

Under section 38 of the Residential Life policies there is a specific policy concerning solicitation. It states "solicitation occurs when those not authorized by Residential Life initiate contact with students without their permission to discuss, sell, survey, or distribute goods, services, or information. Individuals, organizations, or groups wishing to solicit within the residence facilities should contact the appropriate residence area coordinator for further details.

McGuire stated that neither Offutt nor Barchenger contacted any residence area coordinators.

"We're both disappointed this has come down to an integrity issue," said Courtney Skaer, vice presidential candidate. "This has obviously put us at a disadvantage. Not allowing students to vote for who they want and influencing people to vote is not fair."

Skaer said both her and Adam Roll plan to fight for a revote.

"We just want this situation to be evaluated fairly," Skaer said. "There has obviously been a wrong done."

Offutt denies any wrongdoing and commented that infractions are being investigated on the other party also.

"We received the most votes and we won the elections," Kelly Offutt said. "The accusations are completely false. This is what goes on during SGA elections."

The issue is being taken to the Supreme Court of SGA. The court date has yet to be set.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

James
Tue Apr 13 2010 00:53
poop on you
Nick Ian Emenhiser
Thu Mar 11 2010 17:27
Scott, good point--there is currently someone working on it however. Well, I'm not sure if he's working on the APP itself but he is working on a boo koo of social media platforms. In fact he's President Burns Hargis' personal assistant on developing social media platforms that interface into the campus community. The idea is more workable than you'd think.

But then again I'm an "idea person" and not much for practicality..I have no idea how expensive it is, I just know that OSU has the will to make it happen.

Anonymous
Wed Mar 10 2010 06:06
I would like to know why: after the sga elections, an article was in the paper saying the election was being disputed less than 6 hrs afterwards, but now that Derek and Kelly have been found to be the winners AND cleared of EVERY charge, there has been no article.
Scott
Mon Mar 8 2010 17:47
I don't think SGA will ever develop an Iphone app. They are pricier than one would think. The only way it could be done within this next year is if someone is already working on it.
Anonymous
Sat Mar 6 2010 08:13
Me and Rollo were smoking some hash when he told me he was going to start this story if he lost. He's cool, but definitely a sore loser. I mean come on. Bring up stuff about him smashing his girlfriends windshield in? That's old news. He's changed since then. Give him a break. He really really wants to win, why else would he start all the drama?
Nick
Fri Mar 5 2010 21:58
Um. The "polling station" was www.campuslink.okstate.edu. I voted on my phone, is that a "polling station" ? Once SGA develops the iPhone app, will that be a "polling station" ?
Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 15:42
Okay, my bad. Regardless it seems a little messed up.

I like how the person who told me to check my facts got corrected...

Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 15:32
actually, a polling station is two or more computers.
Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 15:32
A polling station is site with one or more computers. Again, check your facts.
Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 15:03
There are multiple (double digits) testimonies that they and/or their campaign staff were walking around with laptops! If you can't pass out fliers within 100 feet of a polling station (computer lab), then what makes it okay that they are carrying around a polling station (laptop)?
Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 13:44
this is retarded. everyone who is posting on here as anon is really obvious, we all know exactly who you people are. adam rollonoveryou and courtney skaerd, time to just go away.
NIE
Fri Mar 5 2010 13:37
In news, what you don't report, with an extremely controversial issue such as this, says as much as what you DO report. The article does not come close to reflecting the factual situation post-election, let alone the actual situation pre-election that led to this. I was an eye witness and saw them there and they were hardly "soliciting" crap, especially as it applies to the RHA stipulation.
strongly
Fri Mar 5 2010 13:28
Adam smashed out his girlfriend's windshield. You can look it up in the Stillwater Police report. You can google it. Not the kind of person I want to lead me. Both sides broke some rules, it hapens. Call the election over.
Davo
Fri Mar 5 2010 12:35
Nick, why are you attacking the writer of this article? There were no accusations made by her, no opinions stated, and it looks to be a well written factual piece. I sure hope that you aren't trying to write anything newsworthy judging by your baseless accusations/inquisitions and opinionated, and yes, meaningless, drivel.
Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 10:55
If Kelly and Derek won once then they can do it again in a revote, no problem.
Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 04:28
Nick... you are a freshman, jackass.
Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 02:10
Kelly and Derek ARE NOT CHEATERS. The only reason you all think this is because of this ridiculous article, that is your only "proof". So everyone that is calling Kelly and Derek cheaters, stop and I DARE you to come up with some evidence. This whole situation is a case of Adam and Courtney being sore losers.
sugra
Fri Mar 5 2010 01:45
Work so hard I couldn't unwind, get some money saved;
Abuse my love a thousand times, however hard I tried.
Heartbreaker, your time has come, can't take your evil way;
Go away, Heartbreaker
gdi4ever
Fri Mar 5 2010 01:06
i wish that fat derik dude would have left me alone... he kept bothering me wen i wuz playing in a halo tourney in kerr... made me vote on his laptop.... good cookies tho...
Anonymous
Thu Mar 4 2010 23:36
No, I am not a student at OSU. I am a student at Texas A&M. And I read the O'colly website because I used to go to OSU. So good gosh, get off your high horse. I was just stating a fact that I wouldn't want any sort of cheaters leading my school. I don't even know who these people are, but it's obvious that they were in the wrong.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In