College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

133 ways this is a man’s magazine

By Karen Sisk

Forum Columnist

|

Published: Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, September 30, 2009

How many of you have tried to be the “fun fearless females” that Cosmopolitan claims it can train you to be?


I, too, once walked that path. However, behind the seemingly woman-positive rhetoric lies the dark secret of this magazine.


Cosmo does not usually teach you anything but how to maintain your appearance and your sexual prowess so that you can attract and keep men.


Is that hard to swallow? Do you need convincing?


Okay — let’s examine the cover of the October 2009 issue.


Megan Fox — an actress more famous for her sex appeal than her roles — overtakes the deceptively pro-woman pink cover in a short, somewhat low-cut pink dress posing as she might for Maxim.


The blurbs on the cover explain that the contents will teach us “Bad Girl Sex: These 12 Moves Will Show Him Your Really Naughty Side,” “One Question No Guy Can Resist,” “The Sexy Ass Workout: 2 Weeks to Tight Cheeks,” “’Hung:’ A Real Guy’s Story,” “What 81% of Men Expect on a First Date,” “Sex Panic: An ER Doc Reveals the Freakiest Down-There Emergencies Ever,” “The 26 Best Beauty Products,” and finally, way down in the lower corner, the socially conscious “True Crime: How She Outsmarted a Brutal Rapist.”


The blurbs Cosmo uses to entice us into reading reveal that this magazine has a male-centric view of women. This means that even though this magazine claims to be a women’s lifestyle magazine, it focuses its content and readers on men and men’s needs and desires rather than the needs and desires of women.


This issue only worsens once opened.


One-hundred thirty-three of the 244 pages are advertisements — mostly for cosmetics, diets or diet supplements, hair care or color. That’s about 54 percent of the magazine dedicated to sell products aimed mostly at helping women become the sort of women Cosmo claims men want.


Most of the other 46 percent explains explicitly how to set out bait for men and then keep them once they’ve been attracted.


“Get Naughty Tonight,” the article billed on the cover as “Bad Girl Sex,” is really about how to keep a man sexually interested in ways that do not necessarily promote any pleasure to the woman who chooses to use this advice. The focus is on how to surprise and please him. Any pleasure a woman gets is incidental.


“The Sexy Ass Workout” has nothing to do with getting in shape for health. It really is about how to get the perfect booty to land the perfect man.


It even comes with a guide to selecting jeans to better show off that sexy ass once it’s been achieved.


Interestingly, “What 81% of Men Expect on a First Date” actually has to do with how the economy has affected dating and romantic relationships entitled “Money & Love: The New Rules.” This could be an interesting article if it had appeared in a different magazine.

Unfortunately, many of the new rules are old ones — men still pay, wanting men that make money is OK and smart — as well as a guide on how to figure out what his finances are. Can you say gold-diggers?


So, ladies, to be Cosmogirls, we have to shift our attention from ourselves, our sexual pleasure, our health and our finances all onto his because, in the end, the man you want or have in your life is really all you need, right?


For those of you that are as repulsed by that idea as I am, spend your $4.29 on a less prescriptive magazine that focuses on women.


Karen Sisk is a Ph.D. student in creative writing, and she received her M.A. in English literature at Wright State.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

9 comments

William
Thu Oct 1 2009 10:25
If any of you think these are the rantings of a crazed feminist, you're probably a confused mysoginist. And a man.
This article sucked.
Thu Oct 1 2009 04:28
133 ways a Ph.D. student bored me to death.
Jim
Thu Oct 1 2009 01:48
Disenchanted: to an extent, you make a good point. Cosmo is, always has been, and probably always will be an easy, easy target. That being said, this is a college newspaper, not a journal, nor a book of theory. Sure, going after Cosmo might seem obvious to many of us who are up to our elbows in feminism, but that's not the audience that these pieces are intended for. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that a critique of Cosmo is very relevant to a mainstream audience of college students aged 18-24 or so. Reading articles like this in my college paper when I was in that age range encouraged me to think critically about many of the pop-monoliths in my life. Especially in Oklahoma, I've noticed that many of these texts are largely left alone, and I don't see any problem in going after an easy target sometimes, if that's what might resonate with an audience. As someone who knows Ms. Sisk personally, I can promise the depth and breadth of her feminism is impressive, indeed. But let's accept the fact that the O'Colly, while a fine college paper, isn't the best forum for conservations of the feminism's nuances and finer points. On the other hand, it is a fine place to get those conversations started and, as any of us who have taught know, sometimes you have to start with the obvious.
Disenchanted
Wed Sep 30 2009 23:49
Agree with some other comments, this just shows how some people can take anything and demonize it by citing a mere fraction of the facts. OK, we all get it. Hooray for women! I do just wonder as someone who is now in one of the more noteworthy feminist blogs I am confused at how the author could "mail this one in". I mean picking on Cosmo? Really?!? Would like to see something with a bit more substance in any following articles. I mean feminists have a hard enough time promoting things w/o this, honestly, waste of space of an article. Lets see what a Ph.d student can really come up with, make us think! ......not roll our eyes and yawn.
Aelfscine
Wed Sep 30 2009 18:52
Strange how there aren't any sections about wowing him with your biting wit, encyclopedic knowledge, or keen insight.
annoyed with replies
Wed Sep 30 2009 16:12
Cosmo is a very entertaining and useful magazine, despite all that you said. The articles within it are very enjoyable, and even funny. I'm sorry that you had to skew your article so much to make it seem like Cosmo readers are brainless saps who are tricked into foregoing their pleasure for the sake of their man."

Defensive much?

Your name
Wed Sep 30 2009 12:32
Cosmo is a pretty superficial magazine, coming from a guy's perspective. It seems like most of the magazine is sex stories and pictures of half naked women (not that a guy would mind) advertising beauty products or the latest "fashion". I laugh to myself when I read the cleverly tacky titles of the sex articles on the front page while I'm standing in line at the store. I'm sure there is some worthwhile content, I mean, the magazine sells, right? I'd read it if I was bored and looking for some cheap entertainment, but I don't see how people can take it seriously, there a definitely a lot of other magazines that are more informative on how to get the most out of your young life besides sex and superficiality.
Pat
Wed Sep 30 2009 12:04
Any chance Kelsey can get a job at the paper. She seems to have more insight and common sense than some already-employed wirters.

Great Response!

Kelsey
Wed Sep 30 2009 11:22
Great article - Really takes feminism to a new level. If I hadn't ever read Cosmo I would believe it. But I think it's great the way that you really skewed the magazine so that it looks like a piece of trash that tricks women into actually having good sex.

Whatever.

I'd like to say - first off - sex sells. It's a universal truth, and it's why it's all over the front page. I disagree with you though, that the magazine focuses solely on this. One section of cosmo is dedicated to sex, not most of it, like you claimed. And your statement that Cosmo only teaches you how to "please your man" is ridiculous. Cosmo's sex tips and information are the reason that I'm as confident as I am in bed - and they help keep sex in my long-term relationship interesting. If you like having sex that's about as dry as sandpaper, then I can understand why you'd think that the tips Cosmo gives "do not necessarily promote any pleasure to the woman who chooses to use this advice. The focus is on how to surprise and please him. Any pleasure a woman gets is incidental."

I'd also love to point out how funny I think it is that you chose to completely overlook Cosmo's Campaign for Safe Sun - they've been doing it at least since I started reading the magazine years ago, so if you've ever actually read a Cosmo, I doubt you missed it. But in case you did, this campaign is all about not using tanning beds and fake-baking, not laying out in the sun, and making sure you use sunscreen. Basically: not conforming to the ideal that you have to have glowing bronze skin in order to be beautiful. It encourages girls to use self-tanner instead of going to a tanning bed and highly increasing their chances for skin cancer. In fact, in this month's magazine that you "read," there was an article inside that talked about a 26-year-old woman dying from melanoma due to her constant tanning. It even included pictures and advice about moles and what melanoma typically looks like, so that you can catch it early if you are unfortunate enough to have it.

On another note, the fact that you use the amount of advertisments in Cosmo against it is crazy- look in any magazine on the rack! They will all have roughly the same amount of advertising held within them, and the fact that they're all about some sort of beauty or clothing product has to do with the fact that that's a likely reason a woman is reading cosmo. I wouldn't expect those same ads to be in a Family Circle magazine.

Cosmo is a very entertaining and useful magazine, despite all that you said. The articles within it are very enjoyable, and even funny. I'm sorry that you had to skew your article so much to make it seem like Cosmo readers are brainless saps who are tricked into foregoing their pleasure for the sake of their man.







log out